Selasa, 01 November 2016

Fact check: Comey's vague letter sparks partisan distortions - USA TODAY

White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest says he has no way of knowing what led to FBI Director James Comey's decision to disclose that the FBI is looking into newly discovered emails in the dormant Clinton investigation. (Oct. 31) AP

FBI Director James Comey's letter to Congress regarding an unexpected development in his agency's investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server was brief and vague, creating a vacuum that has been filled by distorted claims — mostly from the campaign of Clinton's opponent, Donald Trump:

• Trump strung together a series of debunked claims about Clinton's use of a private server while secretary of State to conclude that "this is bigger than Watergate."

• Trump also repeated his unsupported claim that Clinton's "criminal action was willful, deliberate, intentional and purposeful." The FBI found no evidence that Clinton "intended to violate laws" on classified information.

• Mike Pence, Trump's running mate, claimed that Clinton "continues to refuse to turn over some 33,000 e-mails." But Clinton's non-work-related emails were deleted more than a year ago, so Clinton doesn't have them to turn over.

• Clinton claimed that the FBI letter to Congress was "sent to Republican members of the House" and was "only going orig inally to Republican members of the House." Both claims are false.

• Clinton's campaign chairman claimed the FBI review of the new emails "might not be about [Clinton's] server." But the FBI has said it is reviewing the emails that "appear to be pertinent to the investigation" of Clinton's "personal email server."

On Oct. 28, the FBI director sent a three-paragraph letter[1] to Congress that said FBI investigators, during the course of an unrelated investigation, found "the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent" to its prior investigation into Clinton's use of a private email server as secretary of State. The letter said the FBI will review those emails "t o determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation."

Comey wrote that "the FBI cannot yet assess whether this material may be significant" or how long the review will take.

Multiple[2] news[3] reports[4], citing anonymous law enforcement officials, said emails were found on a computer owned by Anthony Weiner, who is the estranged husband of Huma Abedin, a longtime Clinton aide and former deputy chief of staff at the State Department.

The news came more than three months after Comey announced[5] on July 5 that the FBI had completed its investigation and recommended that no charges be brought against Clinton or her aides for mishandling classified information.

The FBI's review of potentially new evidence comes less than two weeks before Election Day. The lack of hard information and the timing of the FBI's announcement have created conditions that are ripe for distortions.

Watergate Comparison

At a rally in Manchester, N.H., on the day of the FBI director's surprising announcement, Trump claimed[6] that "this is bigger than Watergate in my opinion," referring of course to the scandal that led to the resignation of President Richard Nixon and the convictions of numerous others.

But Trum p's case is weak. He supports his conclusion by distorting the facts to fit his conspiracy theory, mostly by repeating already debunked claims about Clinton's emails.

Trump, Oct. 28: "But real change also means getting rid of the corruption in Washington, and again, maybe that's happened. Wow. We have a big day. No think of it, I won my first primary in New Hampshire and I am getting here and the news this morning is — this is bigger than Watergate. This is bigger than Watergate in my opinion. This is bigger than Watergate.

"Hillary bleached and deleted 33,000 e-mails after receiving a congressional subpoena. That alone to me — there were more serious things done, but how does it get much more? But that was so obvious. She gets the subpoena and she bleaches and deletes 33,000 e-mails. That to me — because it was so simple, you know? Not — it's not about the sale of the uranium tha t nobody knows what it means — I know what it means — to Russia. Then she talks to me about Russia. 20% of the uranium in our country to Russia.

"But you know, the deletion of 33,000 e-mails, boy, that just sort of is so out there, after receiving a subpoena from the United States government. She lied to Congress, she lied to the FBI, she made 13 phones disappear, some with a hammer. The Clinton crew gave more than $675,000 to the wife of the deputy director of the FBI and the man who was overseeing the investigation into Hillary's illegal server."

Trump conflates and distorts three separate issues to make his Watergate comparison. Let's take them in order.

"Hillary bleached and deleted 33,000 e-mails after receiving a congressional subpoena."

Trump is referring to 31,830 emails that Clinton's lawyers had deemed personal. These emails did not have to be turned over to the State Department, which in the summer of 2014 requested all work-related emails that the former secretary of state had in her possession. (See "A Guide to Clinton's Emails[7].")

The department's policy allows its employees to determine which emails are work-related and must be preserved. "Messages that are not records may be deleted when no longer needed," according to the State Department's Foreign Affairs Manual (5 FAM 443.5). (See "Trump on the Stump.[8] ")

That means Clinton was within her right to delete these emails, so that's the first thing to know.

Now, Trump is right that these emails were deleted about three weeks after Clinton received a subpoena on March 4 from a Republican-controlled House committee investigating the 2012 deaths of four Americans in Benghazi. However, there is no evidence that she knew that the emails were deleted after the subpoena was issued.

According to the FBI's investigative notes, Cheryl Mills, Clinton's former chief of staff, in December 2014 told Platte River Networks that Clinton had preserved her work-related emails and "no longer needed access to any of her e-mails older than 60 days." At that time, Mills instructed a PRN employee "to modify the e-mail retention policy" on Clinton's server "to reflect this change." That would automatically delete the old emails. But the PRN employee told the FBI that "he had an 'oh shit' moment" after lea rning about the subpoena sometime between March 25 and March 31, 2015, which is when he deleted Clinton's emails. Clinton told the FBI that she was not aware that PRN deleted her emails in late March 2015, and the FBI did not say when she learned that they were deleted. (See "The FBI Files on Clinton's Emails[9].")

PRN used a free software program called BleachBit to delete the emails. That's what Trump means when he says the emails were "bleached." Other times he has said that Clinton "used chemicals[10]" to "acid wash or bleach[11]" her emails. That's part of the deception, too. (See "Trump, Pence 'Acid Wash' Facts[12].")

"She made 13 phones disappear, some with a hammer."

It is true that the FBI said (on page 8[13]) it "identified 13 total mobile devices … which potentially were used to send e-mails using Clinton's clintonemail.com e-mail addresses." But only eight of the 13 were used while Clinton was secretary of state, the FBI said, so Trump exaggerates the number of devices she had during her four years in office. (See "A Guide to Clinton's Emails[14].")

The FBI also quoted a Clinton aide (on page 9[15]) as saying that he could recall on two occasions that he got rid of old mobile devices by breaking them in half or hitting them with a hammer.

Trump insinuates that there is something sinister about owning several mobile devices and destroying the old ones when they are replaced. But the FBI came to no such conclusion, and security experts interviewed by the technology website Wired said[16] destroying old devices is a good wa y to erase data — if done properly.

Wired, Sept. 7: "Whether you're a Secretary of State with a phone full of classified documents or an average sext-sending citizen, data removal is a crucial security step before you let a device leave your control or recycle it. And security experts agree there's at least one surefire way to be certain that data is truly removed and unrecoverable: kill the hardware."

If anything, Wired said, Clinton's aides "should have wrecked them more thoroughly" than they did. The website said her staff should have used a "jackhammer" instead of a hammer, to ensure that data was destroyed and not just the mobile device.

"The Clinton crew gave more than $675,000 to the wife of the deputy director of the FBI."

Trump says the "Clinton crew," but he isn't talking about Clinton or anyone in Clinton's ca mpaign. He is talking about Democratic Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, a longtime friend and supporter of Bill and Hillary Clinton. A political action committee controlled by McAuliffe and the Virginia Democratic Party combined donated more than $675,000[17] to Dr. Jill McCabe, who unsuccessfully ran[18] for a seat in the Virginia Senate in 2015.

McAuliffe's PAC, Common Good VA,[19] made other large donations in 2015: $803,500 to state Senate candidate Jeremy McPike[20], who won his election, and $781,500 to Daniel Gecker[21], who lost. The big donations were part of an all-out effort by the Democratic governor[22] to help his party gain control of the Senate in the November 2015 elections. That effort failed, and the makeup of the Senate remained unchanged with the Republicans holding a narrow 21 to 19 advantage.

Trump focuses on the donations to McCabe, because she is the wife of Andrew McCabe, who at the time of the donations was either head of the FBI field office in Washington, D.C., or assistant deputy director of the FBI. Andrew McCabe was not involved in the FBI investigation of Clinton's emails when his wife w as running for office. He was promoted[23] to deputy director in February 2016, and at that time he assumed "an oversight role in the investigation into Secretary Clinton's emails," according to a statement from an FBI spokesman.

There is no evidence that Clinton had any knowledge of the donations or that they were made to influence the FBI investigation of her handling of classified information. (See "Clinton's Connection to FBI Official[24].")

Trump assembles — or rather disassembles — these half-truths and innuendos to reach his shaky conclusion that "this is bigger than Watergate." That's his opinion, but at least one person who was involved in Watergate disagrees.

John Dean, who served as White House counsel to Nixon from 1970 to 1973. wrote an op-ed in The New York Times[25] calling the Watergate comparison "nonsense."

"On ly someone who knows nothing about the law, and the darkest moment of our recent political history, would see a parallel between Nixon's crimes and Mrs. Clinton's mistakes," Dean said, noting that "some four dozen Nixon aides and associates were convicted of or pleaded guilty to criminal misconduct, including me."

Trump on Clinton's Intent

Trump also has repeatedly claimed that Clinton's "criminal action was willful, deliberate, intentional and purposeful." But the FBI disagrees. Comey said the FBI's investigation didn't find evidence that Clinton "intended to violate laws" on classified information. And he said that "no charges are appropriate in this case."

Trump made the claim in Oct. 29 speeches in both Colorado[26] and Phoenix[27].

At his July 5 press briefing[28] on the FBI's investigation into Clinton's use of a private email server, Comey explained that the inquiry specifically concerned whether classified material had been mishandled "either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way" in violation of federa l law or if classified information has been "knowingly remove[d]" from "appropriate systems or storage facilities."

Comey, who said there was evidence Clinton and her colleagues had been "extremely careless" in handling classified material, said that the FBI didn't find any evidence of an intent to violate such laws.

Comey, July 5: "Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."

The FBI director went on to say that while there was evidence of "potential violations" of classified information statutes, "no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case" in this instance. Why? Comey specifically pointed to the issue of intent. He said that past cases that were prosecuted involved "clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information" combined with other factors, such as "vast quantities of materials exposed," adding that the FBI didn't see that in the Clinton case.

Comey, July 5: "Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person's actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.

"In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quant ities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here."

In his campaign speeches, Trump went on to speculate that Clinton "set up an illegal server for the obvious purpose of shielding her criminal conduct from public disclosure and exposure." No such cover-up of any criminal conduct has been revealed.

The FBI "read all of the approximately 30,000 e-mails provided by Secretary Clinton to the State Department in December 2014," Comey said. And the bureau also found "several thousand work-related e-mails" that weren't in that batch.

Comey said that it was "not surprising" that the FBI found emails that Clinton hadn't given to the State Department. "Our assessment is that, like many e-mail users, Secretary Clinton periodically deleted e-mails or e-mails were purged f rom the system when devices were changed," he said. And, the FBI found no evidence of any kind of cover-up. Comey said the investigation "found no evidence that any of the additional work-related e-mails were intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them."

Pence on Clinton's Deleted Emails

In an Oct. 30 interview[29] on Fox News Sunday, Pence said that "Hillary Clinton continues to refuse to turn over some 33,000 e-mails." But, as we said earlier, Clinton's non-work-related emails were deleted more than a year ago, so Clinton doesn't have them to turn over.

As we have previously written[30], Clinton's office disclosed[31] on March 10, 2015, that she gave the State Department 30,490 work-related emails on Dec. 5, 2014, and "chose not to keep" 31,830 emails she deemed "personal."

"We went through a thorough process to identify all of my work-related emails and deliver them to the State Department," Clinton said at a press conference[32] on March 10, 2015. "At the end, I chose not to keep my private personal emails."

The 31,830 personal emails were deleted "sometime between March 25-31, 2015," according to the FBI notes of its investigation. As we said earlier, the emails were deleted by a PRN employee about three weeks after Clinton received a congressional subpoena on March 4, 2015.

So Clinton is not "continu[ing] to refuse to turn over some 33,000 e-mails," as Pence claimed. Because they were deleted by PRN, she doesn't have them to release.

Clinton's Partisan Implication

In a press conference on Oct. 28, Clinton claimed[33] that the letter Comey sent that day[34] to Congress was "sent to Republican members of the House." A few minutes later in that press conference, Clinton said[35] that letter was "only going originally to Republican members of the House." Both claims are false.

The letter was addressed to Republican chairmen of eight House and Senate committees, but it was sent to the committees, not just those individuals. Listed at the bottom of Comey's letter are the ranking Democratic members of those committees, and, in fact, one of them issued a statement on Oct. 28 indicating that he had received the letter.

The press release from Democratic Rep. Elijah E. Cummings, ranking member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, said[36] that he was issuing "the following statement after receiving a letter from the FBI explaining that it would review new emails related to its investigation of Secretary Clinton."

Cummings and Rep. John Conyers Jr., the Democratic ranking member of the House Committee on the Judiciary, wrote a joint letter[37] to Comey and Attorney General Loretta Lynch, also dated Oct. 28, that said the FBI director had "sent a letter to eight Congressional Committees."

The Clinton campaign told PolitiFact.com[38] that she had misspoken.

< div id="module-position-PdqU8KCkpZ8" class="story-asset gallery-asset">

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

[39][40]

Not About Clinton?

On CNN's State of the Union[41], John Podesta, Clinton's campaign chairman, claimed the FBI decision to review a new batch of emails "might not be about [Clinton's] server," citing reports based on anonymous sources.

Podesta, Oct. 30: "So far there's no charge of wrongdoing. There's no charge even that Hillary — and the reporting that backs it up coming from anonymous law enforcement sources indicates it might not be about her server, it may not be about her at all."

Podesta is right that there's no charge of wrongdoing. But is it true that the latest FBI review "might not be about [Clinton's] server"? We asked the Clinton campaign what Podesta meant. But we did not get a response.

We don't know if the FBI review isn't about Clinton's server, but neither does Podesta.

Here is what we know: The FBI director's statement said investigators during the course of an unrelated investigation found "the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation." By investigation, Comey said he means "the investigation of former Secretary Clinton's personal email s erver."

The FBI does not know yet if the emails are pertinent, and that is the point that Podesta and the campaign have stressed.

However, as we said earlier, news reports indicate that the emails were found on a computer owned by Weiner, the former congressman and estranged husband of Abedin. When she was interviewed by the FBI, Abedin told investigators (page 86[42]) that she had an email account on Clinton's private server — huma@clintonemail.com — and that she "routinely forwarded emails from her state.gov account to either her clintonemail.com or her yahoo.com account so she could print them." That would explain how the FBI came to discover potential classifie d information on Weiner's computer.

NBC News' Pete Williams reported[43] that he was told by law enforcement that "these are not emails from Hillary Clinton," and that may explain Podesta's comment. But Williams did not say that the latest FBI review "might not be about [Clinton's] server."

Also, The New York Times reported[44] that "[s]ome of Ms. Abedin's emails passed through Mrs. Clinton's private server," citing unnamed law enforcement officials.

For a full list of sources, see FactCheck.org[45].

Read or Share this story: http://usat.ly/2f9jrUT

References

  1. ^ three-paragraph letter (twitter.co m)
  2. ^ Multiple (www.nbcnews.com)
  3. ^ news (www.nytimes.com)
  4. ^ reports (www.cbsnews.com)
  5. ^ announced (www.fbi.gov)
  6. ^ claimed (www.c-span.org)
  7. ^ A Guide to Clinton's Emails (www.factcheck.org)
  8. ^ Trump on the Stump. (www.factcheck.org)
  9. ^ The FBI Files on Clinton's Emails (www.factcheck.org)
  10. ^ used chemicals (crooksandliars.com)
  11. ^ acid wash or bleach (www.c-span.org)
  12. ^ Trump, Pence 'Acid Wash' Facts (www.factcheck.org)
  13. ^ page 8 (vault.fbi.gov)
  14. ^ A Guide to Clinton's Emails (www.factcheck.org)
  15. ^ page 9 (vault.fbi.gov)
  16. ^ said (www.wired.com)
  17. ^ $675,000 (followthemoney.org)
  18. ^ unsuccessfully ran (www.loudountimes.com)
  19. ^ Common Good VA, (followthemoney.org)
  20. ^ Jeremy McPike (wtop.com)
  21. ^ Daniel Gecker (www.richmond.com)
  22. ^ all-out effort by the Democratic governor (www.dailypress.com)
  23. ^ was promoted (www.fbi.gov)
  24. ^ Clinton's Connection to FBI Official (www.factcheck.org)
  25. ^ op-ed in The New York Times (www.nytimes.com)
  26. ^ Colorado (youtu.be)
  27. ^ Phoenix (youtu.be)
  28. ^ July 5 press briefing (www.fbi.gov)
  29. ^ an Oct. 30 interview (www.foxnews.com)
  30. ^ we have previously written (www.factcheck.org)
  31. ^ disclosed (cdn.factcheck.org)
  32. ^ press conference (time.com)
  33. ^ claimed (youtu.be)
  34. ^ the letter Comey sent that day (www.nytimes.com)
  35. ^ said (youtu.be)
  36. ^ said (democrats.oversight.house.gov)
  37. ^ wrote a joint letter (democrats.oversight.house.gov)
  38. ^ told PolitiFact.com (www.politifact.com)
  39. ^ (www.usatoday.com)
  40. ^ (www.usatoday.com)
  41. ^ State of the Union (transcripts.cnn.com)
  42. ^ page 86 (vault.fbi.gov)
  43. ^ reported (twitter.com)
  44. ^ reported (www.nytimes.com)
  45. ^ see FactCheck.org (www.factcheck.org)

The Daily 202: If these Latinos vote, Hillary Clinton will probably win Florida - Washington Post

Leticia Nieves, a paid canvasser for the Center for Community Change Action, knocks on doors in the suburbs of Orlando to urge Latinos who do not typically vote to come out for Hillary Clinton. (Photo by James Hohmann)

With Breanne Deppisch

THE BIG IDEA:

KISSIMMEE, Fla.—Barack Obama narrowly won Florida in 2012 by expanding the electorate. Hillary Clinton, with help from her allies, is trying to do that again in 2016.

Indicators on the ground and in the early ballot numbers suggest that many low-frequency voters, particularly Latinos, will participate in this year's election.

Every poll shows that the Sunshine State, which ga ve the country Bush vs. Gore, is once again within the margin of error. The president carried the state four years ago by less than 1 percentage point.

Donald Trump, who has been relatively strong in Florida all year, needs the state's 29 electoral votes in any realistic scenario that gets him to 270. The attention being paid to the state reflects its special, quadrennial importance: Clinton rallies today in Tampa, Orlando and Fort Lauderdale. Trump has events scheduled tomorrow in Miami, Orlando, Pensacola and then, on Thursday morning, in Jacksonville.

Pro-Clinton forces undeniably have a better ground game than pro-Trump forces, which were slow to ramp up.

It is helpful to think of get-out-the-vote operations like a special teams unit in football. It will not win you the game if you're down a few touchdowns, but it can make the difference at the end of a close match-up. Right now, Clinton really just needs a field goal to block Trump's path to the presidency. But it's not totally clear how many yards she has to kick the ball.

That is why the kind of canvassing work that Leticia Nieves is doing in this working-class suburb of Orlando could prove pivotal. Two months ago, the 37-year-old was unemployed and living in Mount Pocono, Pennsylvania, when she saw an ad offering $15 an hour to knock doors in Florida. Now she is one of nearly 500 paid canvassers working in Florida for the Center for Community Change Action[1].

The progressive group has spent the past four months targeting a very specific universe of 384,000 Florida Latinos. They are low-propensity voters who are likely to support Democrats. That means t hey are registered but have either never participated or only cast a ballot in one of the previous four elections (typically the presidential in either 2012 or 2008.)

Mobilization matters more right now than persuasion. This sign hangs in the group's field office. (James Hohmann)

I spent a shift shadowing Nieves, who was born in the Bronx and spent her teenage years in Puerto Rico, as she tried to convince about a hundred folks that they should vote in 2016. Speaking their native Spanish, she was an effective messenger --- but it also seemed to be a surprisingly easy sell.

Edgardo Casiano, a cable technician who is registered to vote but has not done so since moving to Florida, initially said he was supp orting Trump when Nieves knocked on his door. His wife walked up from behind and smacked him on the arm. She told the visitors at her door that he was just joking around, and that they both support Clinton. "If he doesn't vote for Hillary, I will divorce him! Seriously," said Marlin Colon, a Mary Kay beauty consultant, as their two kids watched TV in the living room.

The conversation that followed with the 29-year-olds showed the value of these face-to-face encounters – and the challenges of mobilizing hard-to-reach voters.

The husband said he would go online to vote early. Nieves had to explain that you cannot vote on the internet but must do so in person. That surprised him. She told him exactly where he could go and talked about how easy it was. "Anytime from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m.," she said.

Then the wife, who loves the idea of Clinton being the first woman president, spoke up to say she filled out paperwork with someone at th e mall so she could vote, but she received a letter from the board of elections saying that her registration did not go through because the Social Security number on her form was invalid. She wondered if it was too late to vote this year. The canvasser gave her the website and phone number for the local elections office and urged her to follow up as soon as possible.

Leticia Nieves knocks on 40 doors before allowing herself a drink of water at the start of her canvassing shift. It keeps her focused and motivated. (James Hohmann)

And so it went for much of Nieves' six hours at the door last Friday, from 2 p.m. until nearly 8 p.m. These low-propensity voters were incredibly enthusiastic about voting, but they often did not know basic information about how or where to do it. She explained patiently the requirement to bring a photo ID and why it is important to not just vote for the presidential candidates but also in the U.S. Senate race.

Many of the conversations were in Spanglish. Past a Honduran pupuseria and a Dollar Store, in a modest subdivision of single-family homes, one middle-aged woman hesitantly cracked open her door. Suspiciously eyeing her visitors, she asked: "Are you a Democrat?" When Nieves said yes, the door opened wide and the woman smiled broadly. She said she already voted for Clinton. Then she fretted that her 27-year-old daughter does not see the point. "We need to push her because she is lazy," her mother sighed. "So lazy!" She promised that she would keep nagging her daughter, who still lives at home, until she votes.

Nieves next persuaded a man named Jose, who works in the service industry, to vote early. He said he would go on Tuesday, his day off. A few houses later, a man who has not voted since the 2008 election said he will definitely vote for Clinton. "If I opened the garage, you'd see a bumper sticker for Hillary," he said. "No Trump, no Trump, no Trump," an apron-clad woman named Consuela, who was preparing a dinner of chicken and chickpeas for her grandchildren, said on the next block.

An Ecuadorian immigrant in her late 70s answered the door in a bathrobe. "You can leave whatever you want as long as it is not for that crazy loon," she said in Spanish, referring to Trump, when she saw the pile of political brochures in Nieves's hand. "I am for Hillary," the canvasser replied. Then the woman's husband, Humberto Nunes, came to the door and heard the pitch. The couple agreed to go vote for Clinton and Patrick Murphy first thing the next morning.

The Center for Community Change Action field office in Kissimmee, which used to be an Einstein's bagel shop, proudly flies a Puerto Rican flag. It's next to a gold buyers shop and shares a parking lot with a mini-golf course. (James Hohmann)

-- The influx of Latinos into the Orlando area has been dramatic. Kissimmee is in Osceola County. In 2004, George W. Bush beat John Kerry in this county by 5 points. In 2012, Obama crushed Mitt Romney by 25 points.

Many Puerto Ricans fleeing the debt crisis in the U.S. territory have settled here. They are already American citizens so can easily register to vote in Florida. The state's Puerto Rican population, in excess of 1 million people, has doubled over 15 years. Experts say 1,0 00 new Puerto Rican families are re-settling in the state every month.

Kissimmee is in Alan Grayson's House district. Grayson vacated the seat to unsuccessfully seek the Democratic nomination for Senate. He threw his support behind his wife in the open primary to succeed him, but she lost to a Puerto Rican state senator. It is just the latest way that an emerging community is flexing its muscle.

-- Various efforts to register new voters have already paid off for the left. Only 45 percent of the 493,000 people who have registered to vote in Florida since the start of August are white. Democrats expanded their voter registration advantage by almost 70,000 over the course of the summer, so they go into this election with a 327,000 registration advantage statewide.

-- A surprising number of low propensity voters have voted early so far. About 3.73 million ballots have already been cast in Florida, compared to a total of 8.5 million votes that were cast in 2012, including on Election Day. More than 400,000 of the registered Democrats who have voted early have either not voted in the past three elections or voted just once. Among Republicans, that number is 336,000. Of the nearly 200,000 registered Hispanic Democrats who have already voted, 50 percent fall into that category. Through the weekend, 70 percent of early voters have been white, compared to 14 percent Hispanic and 11 percent African American. (Hispanics account for about 16 percent of Florida's registered voters.)

Mobilizing the voters who are with you is far more important than persuading new ones to support you at this point. "This is a state all about managing these micro margins," said Steve Schale, a Tallahassee-based operative who directed Obama's efforts in Florida and has been crunching these numbers every day. "She has a 1 point to 1.5 point demogra phic advantage built in. The blocking and tackling at the doors … is where we are at in this election. It's a huge funnel of people. You're just trying to get as many people out of the bottom as possible."

-- The Florida canvassers with Center for Community Change Action have faced off with humidity and Hurricane Matthew. When the Zika virus became a problem, the door knockers who work out of the three offices in Miami-Dade County, got extra rations of mosquito repellant.

They have learned many lessons during four months on the ground. When they first started knocking doors in June, the walkers carried flyers that included a big picture of Trump. It was an unflattering image, but they discovered that it made the Hispanics less likely to engage. Seeing the picture and not speaking English, they assumed the people coming to their door were representatives from the Trump campaign. Trump's image now does not appear in any of their materials.

Nieves said she was chased by dogs in one development recently. In another, someone anonymously called the cops on her. Organizers are advised not to wear black, gold or red – to avoid being mistaken as somehow affiliated with area street gangs. She goes with the non-controversial color grey.

-- CCCA has similar, but smaller, programs to drive low-propensity turnout in Nevada and Colorado. Using the most sophisticated social science research on social pressure, the group is experimenting with various efforts to make sure these voters follow through when they commit to vote. During phone banks, canvassers do what they call "catch-and-release calls." If someone agrees to vote, they are asked to record a brief message about why it is important. Before Election Day, they receive an automated call and the message is replayed to them. Mailers are going out in the days before the el ection that detail their voting history in comparison to their neighbors. This makes people uncomfortable, but it is effective. "Most campaigns don't want to invest the money to get the hardest voters," said Chris Torres, the national campaign director for the group's Immigrant Voter Project. "Everything we're doing is additive to what the campaign is going to be doing."

Hillary Clinton campaigns in Cleveland yesterday. (Melina Mara/The Washington Post)

-- The Clinton campaign, which cannot coordinate with these groups, has carefully customized its own pitch for Latinos. Their field office in Kissimmee opened in August and is full of bilingual staffers. You cannot listen to Spanish-language radio stations here without hearing ads from Clinton about Puerto Rico's debt crisis[2]. The campaign took special care to get the accent of the narrator just right. (The speaker in Clinton's ad in Miami has a Cuban accent…) Trump has run no ads in Spanish. The communications team has also worked to pitch stories to Puerto Rican newspapers, in hopes that the people who have moved to Orlando still read their traditional news sources from San Juan.

In places like Arizona and Nevada, which have large numbers of Mexican-Americans, Clinton's ads emphasize Trump's promise to build a border wall. If you listen carefully, that's not part of the Clinton paid media in Florida. P uerto Ricans are already citizens, and the wall is not a concern for the Cuban community. But many are offended by other insensitive remarks Trump has made about the broader community.

-- One week out from Election Day, a red flag for Brooklyn: Nationally, early voting has increased sharply among Hispanics – a sign that anti-Trump backlash will indeed materialize at the polls. "But African Americans are turning out in smaller numbers than they did with Obama on the ticket," Dave Weigel reports[3]. "Early returns show a boost in turnout in heavily Latino coun ties and a decline in largely African American ones (in Florida). In a state such as Nevada, where Democrats are relying heavily on Latinos, early returns show they are voting in similar numbers as in 2012, boosting Democratic chances. But in battleground states such as Ohio where Democrats are counting on African Americans to put them over the top, they could be in trouble..."

WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING:

Donald Trump stumped alongside Bobby Knight in Grand Rapids, Michigan, last night. (Nati Harnik/AP)

-- "Trump Used Legally Dubious Method to Avoid Paying [4]Taxes[5]," by five reporters in the New York Times: "Trump proudly acknowledges he did not pay a dime in federal income taxes for years on end. He insists he merely exploited tax loopholes legally available to any billionaire. … But newly obtained documents show that in the early 1990s, as he scrambled to stave off financial ruin, Mr. Trump avoided reporting hundreds of millions of dollars in taxable income by using a tax avoidance maneuver so legally dubious his own lawyers advised him that the [IRS ] would most likely declare it improper if he were audited. Thanks to this one now-outlawed maneuver, Trump potentially escaped paying tens of millions of dollars in federal personal income taxes. Tax experts who reviewed the newly obtained documents … said Mr. Trump's tax avoidance maneuver, conjured from ambiguous provisions of highly technical tax court rulings, clearly pushed the edge of the envelope of what tax laws permitted at the time. 'Whatever loophole existed was not 'exploited' here, but stretched beyond any recognition,' said Steven Rosenthal, a senior fellow at the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center."

President Obama and Michelle Obama react to a flash mob of dancers portraying zomb ies from Michael Jackson's "Thriller." (Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)

GET SMART FAST:​​

  1. The Obamas greeted a long trail of trick-or-treaters at their final White House Halloween party, donning sweaters and jeans as they uncharacteristically urged children to gorge on candy and (temporarily!) abandon healthy eating habits. The top costume of the night went to a family dressed up as Zach Galifianakis' "Two Ferns" show, and a little kid dressed as a silvery-haired Obama. (Greg Jaffe[6])
  2. A Philadelphia transit strike began this morning, aft er employers and union workers failed to come to a consensus over pension and health care funding. This will impact hundreds of thousands of commuters, many of whom rely on public transit agency to get to work and school. (AP)
  3. Police in South Korea used an emergency detention law to jail a woman accused of acting as the country's "shadow president" and exerting undue influence on President Park Geun-hye. Allegations of the woman's undue influence have so incensed the country that one man drove an excavator more than 100 miles to ram it into the prosecutor's office where she's being held. (Anna Fifield[7])
  4. New research in Seattle and Boston found that drivers on ride-hailing apps such as Lyft and Uber racially discriminate against customers. They faced both a longer wait time and more than double the amount of cancelled rides. (Bloomberg[8])
  5. Chicago suffered its most violent weekend of 2016, after 17 people were fatally shot between Friday and Monday. Police said victims included an eighth-grade honors student and twin 17-year-old boys. (Chicago Tribune[9])
  6. A festive Halloween hayride in Mississippi turned tragic after the vehicle overturned on the side of the road, killing at least three and leaving several others injured. (Travis M. Andrews[10])
  7. Little Roc k police are investigating a shooting that occurred in the parking lot of the Clinton Presidential Library. It was apparently a botched robbery attempt. One man was injured. (Travis M. Andrews[11])
  8. Florida authorities released audio recordings of Omar Mateen's conversations with police for the first time, making public conversations the Pulse nightclub gunman had with dispatchers and negotiators during the standoff. (Miami Herald[12])
  9. A 13-year-old boy in Georgia had to have his leg amputated after a school behavioral specialist slammed him to the ground "multiple times" while at school. Attorneys for the boy said "at least" three other educators witnessed the incident but did not intervene. (Kristine Guerra[13])
  10. Iraqi forces are preparing to advance into Mosul, making a first break into the city as they attempt to wrest control from the Islamic State. Commanders say the y can't predict how much resistance they will face, though leaders seemed buoyed after making faster-than-expected progress towards the city's eastern outskirts. (Loveday Morris and Mustafa Salim[14])
  11. A post-Brexit spike in hate crimes and bigotry towards immigrants has led to a dramatic increase in British Jews applying for German citizenship. The number of inquiries is stunning, especially because it involves many Britons whose ancestors desperately fled Nazi rule in Germany and Austria in the 1930s. They grew up with the memory of their parents' or grandparents' traumat ic uprooting, the loss of loved ones in the Holocaust and ancestors who were stripped of German citizenship by the Third Reich. (Ishaan Tharoor[15])
  12. Lebanon's parliament elected former general Michel Aoun as president, ending a two-year leadership vacuum caused by factional squabbling.  Aoun, a Maronite Christian, is backed by Hezbollah and his election will allow Iran more influence in Lebanese affairs. (Hugh Naylor[16])
  13. The founder of Chobani yogurt has emerged as a major advocate for refugees, employing hundreds from Iraq, Afghanistan and Turkey at his factories and even starting a foundation to help migrants safely travel to Greece. But the advocacy has made him the target of a rising wave of racist social media attacks, including some who are calling for complete boycott of his company. (New York Times< a href="#readabilityFootnoteLink-17" class="readability-DoNotFootnote" style="color: inherit;">[17])
  14. People in the world's smoggiest cities have begun purchasing "bottled air" from less-polluted areas across the globe. The packaged oxygen goes for nearly $100 a pop – but some desperate consumers said they are willing to try "anything." (New York Times[18])
  15. A Miami man is making headlines after dressing up his 13-foot pet alligator in a neon purple top hat and sunglasses for Halloween. He says such getups are tradition for "Gwendolyn," the pizza-eating, cookie-devo uring gator he's had for nearly 50 years. (WSVN[19]; picture here[20].)

A man dressed as Trump for Halloween, with tiny hands, in West Hollywood. (Reuters/David McNew)

FRESH POLLING:

-- A brand new Washington Post-Schar School poll finds Clinton holding a 6 point lead in VIRGINIA (48-42). Clinton's team pulled ads in the state weeks ago. And George Mason Policy and Government dean Mark Rozell said Clinton's lead does not look commanding when put into historical context, noting that polling in recent off-year Senate and gubernatorial contests has overestimated Democrats' margin of victory. "Bottom line, Virginia is still in play," he sai d.[21]

-- An NBC/SurveyMonkey poll[22] finds Clinton with a 6 point national lead over Trump (47-41), holding steady since James Comey's announcement.

-- A University of New Hampshire/WMUR poll[23] shows Clinton up 7 in NEW HAMPSHIRE (46-39). Kelly Ayotte and Maggie Hassan are neck-and-neck (44-43). 

-- A Fox 2 Detroit/Mitchell poll[24] has Clinton up 6 points in MICHIGAN, with Gary Johnson at 6 percent and Jill Stein at 2 percent. In a two-way race, Clinton's lead climbs to 8 points.

-- Monmouth University [25]has Trump up 11 in INDIANA (50-39), but Evan Bayh and Todd Young are tied at 45 in the Senate race. Democrat John Gregg, notably, is leading Mike Pence's lieutenant governor by 6 points (48-42) in the governor's race.

THE BATTLEGROUNDS:

-- Our in-house handicapper Stu Rothenberg writes [26]today that the forecast is still "cloudy" to say who will control the Senate: "About half of the 11 races that have been watched at some point over the last year are still too-close-to-call. But Republicans remain on the defensive, and Democrats have many routes to gaining the four seats they need ... The re-emergence of Hillary Clinton's email issue puts the former secretary of state on the defensive and gives ammunition to GOP House and Senate candidate... The Republicans' problem is that, unless they win the Nevada Senate race, they'll need to win at least four of the five tightest contests ... Comey's letter ... gives GOP strategists reason for hope, and a race-by-race assessment ... suggests that anything from a Democratic gain of as few as three to as many as eight seats is possible. But given the much greater Republican vulnerability, Democrat gains of four to seven seats now looks most likely. And that would flip the Senate."

-- Democrats filed lawsuits in Arizona, Nevada, Ohio and Pennsylvania, alleging that Trump, Republican state parties and militia groups led by vocal Trump supporter Roger Stone are conspiring to intimidate and block minorities from voting. Trump is violating federal civil rights "by us ing the loudest microphone in the nation to implore his supporters to engage in unlawful intimidation" at polling places, the lawsuit filed in Pennsylvania says. (David Weigel[27])

-- Ohio Gov. John Kasich followed through on his vow not to vote for Trump, writing in John McCain via absentee ballot instead. (The Plain Dealer[28])

-- Rick Perry has been strongly encouraging Rep. Michael McCaul to challenge Ted Cruz in the 2018 Republican primary. (Texas Tribune[29])

-- North Carolina Sen. Richard Burr apologized after he was caught on tape joking about how a rifle magazine should have put a "bullseye" on its cover photo of Clinton. "It's got a picture of Hillary Clinton on the front of it," he said. "I was a little bit shocked at that — didn't have the bullseye on it!" (Mike DeBonis[30])

-- Former Indiana Sen. Evan Bayh's campaign fundraiser sat in on meetings with donors in his official Senate office, according to a copy of his internal 2009 schedule obtained by CNN[31]. The move raises potential conflict-of-interest concerns as to how he engaged with fundraisers, lobbyists and donors during his previous tour of duty in the Capitol.

-- The Republican's campaign also indefinitely black-l isted the Raleigh News & Observer[32], refusing to provide details of his schedule [33]to the Raleigh paper until reporters can "demonstrate the ability to cover this race from a balanced point of view." The move limits the newspaper from covering his public appearances. This is not something winning campaigns do...

-- Paul Ryan will stump in a cluster of bat tleground districts over the next two days. The speaker will appear in Indiana, Michigan and New York today, followed by Virginia, Iowa and Minnesota tomorrow.

-- A lot of groups are going to release their closing TV ads today because this is the start of the final week. 

Here is a first look at the Freedom Partners Action Fund attack on Democratic gubernatorial candidate Roy Cooper in North Carolina (backed up by $500,000):

And here is a sneak peek at the closing ad against Russ Feingold from Americans for Prosperity, another member of the Koch political network (backed up by $950,000):

Donald does a walk through at the RNC in July with Paul Manafort and daugh ter Ivanka. (Rick Wilking/Reuters)

A RUSSIAN CONNECTION?

-- The FBI has been conducting a "preliminary inquiry" into former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort's business connections, NBC[34] reports, stopping just shy of a full-blown criminal investigation. Manafort responded: "None of it is true. There's no investigation going on by the FBI that I'm aware of." He also denied any ties to Putin's government, slamming accusations as "Democratic propaganda."

-- Slate's Franklin Foer[35] spoke to a group of computer scientists who believe that a server at the Trump Organization was covertly communicating with a Russian bank that is tied to Putin's government. The purpose of the server is unclear. Foer reported that the communications appear to resemble "the pattern of human conversation" and took place during normal working hours in both New York and Moscow. Foer acknowledges in his piece that "what the scientists amassed wasn't a smoking gun." But he does note the "suggestive" evidence. (HuffPost[36])

-- Mother Jones's David Corn[37] claims that a former senior intelligence officer who specialized in Russian counterintelligence efforts for a Western country told him that he provided memos to the FBI, based on his conversations with Russian sources, that claim Moscow has been "grooming" Trump for years. "The first memo … noted, 'Russian regime has been cultivating, supporting and assisting TR UMP for at least 5 years. Aim, endorsed by PUTIN, has been to encourage splits and divisions in western alliance.' It maintained that Trump 'and his inner circle have accepted a regular flow of intelligence from the Kremlin, including on his Democratic and other political rivals.' It claimed that Russian intelligence had 'compromised' Trump during his visits to Moscow and could 'blackmail him.' It also reported that Russian intelligence had compiled a dossier on Clinton based on 'bugged conversations she had on various visits to Russia and intercepted phone calls.'" The ex-spy claimed that the FBI asked him for more information in August, and he's continued to share information with the bureau. 'It's quite clear there was or is a pretty substantial inquiry going on,' he says." Corn broke Mitt Romney's 47 percent tape four years ago for the liberal magazine.

-- But, but, but: Law enforcement officials insist that no investigation s so far have found any conclusive or direct links between Trump and the Russian government, the New York Times reports.[38] "And even the hacking into Democratic emails, FBI and intelligence officials believe, was aimed at disrupting the presidential race rather than electing Trump."

-- The Financial Times endorses Clinton[39] this morning on the grounds that Trump� ��s foreign policy and ties to Russia render him unfit to serve: "Mrs. Clinton carries enough baggage to fill a Boeing 747. She is not trusted by the majority of voters," the paper's editorial board says. "But she is manifestly more competent than Mr Trump whose braggadocio, divisiveness and meanness are on daily display. Despite her faults, Mrs Clinton is eminently qualified..."

Hillary on her plane in Cleveland (Melina Mara/The Washington Post)

THE LATEST ON THE NEWLY-DISCOVERED EMAILS:

-- The Justice Department tried (and failed) to quell outrage and frenetic speculation surrounding James Comey's Friday disclosure that the FBI resumed its investigation of Clinton' s private email server. From Sari Horwitz, Tom Hamburger and Ellen Nakashima: [40]"The department signaled that it now wants the politically charged investigation to follow standard procedures, including a strict limit on official comments about the probe and the provision of updates to Congress through routine channels. But after Comey's highly unusual disclosure last week … it may prove impossible for Justice to lower the temperature and regain contro l over how the investigation is conducted and depicted to the public."

-- Lawmakers who pressed Comey for details -- including the number of emails involved, and when FBI officials will know how many emails are duplicates -- received a lame, three-paragraph note in response. "We assure you that the Department will continue to work closely with the FBI and together, dedicate all necessary resources and take appropriate steps as expeditiously as possible," the DOJ liaison to Congress wrote.

-- The Clinton campaign accused Comey of practicing a "double standard" after CNBC[41] reported that he delayed the release of an FBI statement blaming the Russians for seeking to influence the presidential race on the grounds that it would be "too close to the election." From John Wagner, Jenna Johnson and Abby Phillip[42]: "There is no case," Clinton herself declared during a campaign stop in Ohio, predicting that the new inquiry will reach the same conclusion as the FBI investigation in July. 

-- Criticism of Comey continued to mount, with both Democrats and Republicans amplifying demands that he and Attorney General Loretta Lynch provide a more detailed account of the inve stigation. Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said the lack of detail in Comey's Friday letter "did not go far enough" and was thus unfair to all parties involved: "Unfortunately, your letter failed to give Congress and the American people enough context to evaluate the significance or full meaning of this development," he wrote. "Without additional context, your disclosure is not fair to Congress, the American people, or Secretary Clinton." (Tom Hamburger[43])

-- Huma Abedin has told colleagues that she was "taken aback" when she learned that the FBI found her emails on a laptop belonging to her estranged husband, Anthony Weiner, and doesn't know how the messages got there. (Politico's Josh Gerstein[44])

-- "Comey Role Recalls Hoover's F.B.I., Fairly or Not[45]," by the New York Times's Scott Shane and Sharon LaFraniere: "Since [Obama] named [Comey] direc tor of the F.B.I. in 2013, the 6-foot-8 former prosecutor has spoken often of dark chapters in the bureau's history, notably J. Edgar Hoover's order to wiretap the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and use the tapes to try to drive the civil rights leader to suicide. 'The reason I do those things,' Mr. Comey [once said], 'is to ensure that we remember our mistakes and that we learn from them.' His point: The nation's leading law enforcement agency must preserve investigations from any taint of political motive or extralegal influence. So it may be especially painful to Mr. Comey that today … some critics and historians are comparing him to Hoover. The parallels to Hoover, who ran the F.B.I. and its predecessor from 1924 to 1972 as a fief that reflected his personal and political views, may be quite a stretch. Indeed, it may be his determination to be the anti-Hoover, transparent and above politics, that has gotten Mr. Comey in hot water."

Clinton celebrates Halloween with her staff aboard the campaign plane in Cleveland. (Photo by Melina Mara/The Washington Post)

THE DAILY HILLARY

-- CNN cut ties with interim DNC chair Donna Brazile after another WikiLeaks revelation that she fed Clinton's campaign primary debate questions. Hacked emails from March show Brazile sharing details on a question that would be asked in Flint. CNN announced her departure in a statement: "We are completely uncomfortable with what we have learned about her interactions with the Clinton campaign while she was a CNN contributor." (Paul Farhi[46])

-- Tim Kaine plans to deliver remarks at a Phoenix campaign rally completely in Spanish this week. (John Wagner[47])

-- "Allies said Clinton remains 'cautiously optimistic' about her chances to win next week, but is concerned that the latest email flap would leave her fur ther damaged upon entering the White House, and hurt chances of Democrats retaking the Senate majority," Politico's Annie Karni reports.[48]

Trump holds up a rainbow flag with "LGBTs for TRUMP" written on it at a campaign rally in Greeley. (Reuters/Carlo Allegri)

THE DAILY DONALD:

-- Trump has flip-flopped several times on whether or not he voted for Georg e W. Bush, according to newly-unearthed audio from CNN[49]: In 2009, he agreed with radio host Don Imus when he told him he didn't vote for Bush: "I didn't either, by the way," Trump reassured him. "You're good. I just thought that guy was a dimwit. You looked at it, and he just didn't look like he was all there. You look at his eyes, I mean he'd make a speech and you'd look at him and you'd say, 'Does he even know what he's reading?' This guy, he was a horrible president," said Trump. Four years earlier, however, claimed the exact opposite: "I voted for Bush because I think he's got certain things that are excellent, including a tax policy that's excellent and going to prove to be excellent," Trump told Bill O'Reilly in 2005. As recently as January of this year, Trump said he voted for Bush in both the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections. (Andrew Kaczynski[50])

-- Trump is refusing to pay his own campaign pollster three quarters of a million dollars, with FEC filings showing the campaign is disputing nearly $767,000 owed to veteran pollster Tony Fabrizio. (Matea Gold[51])

-- The Trump Organization executive charged with overseeing development on the Old Post Office hotel in D.C. stayed through construction of the project – but quit one day after it opened. David Orowitz, who worked for the company for eight years, declined to offer details on his departure. (Jonathan O'Connell[52])

-- A defense attorney, in closing arguments, blasted Trump transition chairman Chris Christie and his inner circle as "COWARDS" for not testifying in the Bridgegate trial. From the AP's David Porter[53]: "In an emotional presentation … Michael Critchley cast client Bridget Kelly as a single mother faced with an administration more concerned with keeping Christie's nascent presidential hopes alive than with exposing the truth when details of the scandal surfaced three years ago. In a rebuttal summation, a prosecutor urged jurors to ignore the insinuations about Christie and others and focus on the evidence against the two defendants, which he called 'devastating.' Kelly, Christie's former deputy chief of staff, and Bill Baroni, a former Port Authority executive, both face up to 20 years in pris on on the most serious counts."

-- The Trump campaign said the candidate will be disciplined and focused on talking about Obamacare today, specifically at a joint 11 a.m. appearance with Mike Pence in Valley Forge, Pa. Also scheduled to attend the event: Ben Carson, Rep. Tom Price (R-GA), Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD), Rep. Renee Ellmers (R-NC), Rep. Scott DesJarlais (R-TN), Rep. Mike Burgess (R-TX), Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY) and Rep. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY).

WHAT PUNDITS ARE SAYING ABOUT THE FBI MELODRAMA:

-- "If anything, it's easier to gauge the impact of this development on the atmosphere in Washington AFTER the election," writes Wall Street Journal bureau chief Gerald F. Seib[54]. "It's bound to make what already figured to be a nasty environment even worse. Let's assume the Comey bombshell produces some dramatic change in the race and opens the way to a Trump victory. Democrats, not Mr. Trump, will be the ones charging the system was rigged and the election stolen ... On the other hand, if the development is insufficient to derail what appeared to be a Clinton march toward victory, Republicans … already have served notice that they will launch from there a series of investigations into the newly disclosed trove of Clinton emails and why they weren't discovered previously. In that case, the acrimony of an angry campaign will carry into a new administration and a new Congress."

-- The Post's Editorial Board urges voters to stay calm and, in a modified version of the Hippocratic Oath, do no further harm. � ��[This] consists in large part of recalling what we already know: that Ms. Clinton, foolishly and arrogantly, ignored State Department guidelines and used a personal email server while working as secretary of state. That a thorough FBI investigation found no harm to national security in the practice, virtually no mishandling of classified information … At this point, there is no reason to believe that new emails, if any, would be inconsistent with the story that has emerged. Meanwhile, here's something else we know: Mr. Trump is the least qualified and most dangerous major-party nominee for president in our lifetimes ... Nothing Mr. Comey said Friday changes that, either."

--  Nixon's former White House lawyer, John Dean, blasts Trump for comparing the email scandal to Watergate: "Whatever mistakes Mrs. Clinton made, her actions bear no similarities whatsoever to Nixon's criminalization of his presidency, and his eff orts to corrupt much of the executive branch," he writes in a New York Times op-ed[55]. "To compare them to Watergate is more than historical ignorance."

-- Hillary must commit to preserving White House records if elected, argues Timothy Naftali, former director of the Nixon Presidential Library: "Should she win, as it still seems likely she will, Mrs. Clinton ought to consider taking very public steps, very soon, to reassure Americans of her commitment to the protection of official records and transparency. No one wants to have to worry that some of her future White House electronic records will go missing," he writes in a Times op-ed.[56]

-- The New York Times' Editorial Board[57] calls the news sadly fitting: "In an election that has featured the obliteration of one long-accepted political or social no rm after another, it is sadly fitting that one of the final and perhaps most consequential acts was to undermine the American people's trust in the nation's top law enforcement agencies."

-- The New Yorker's Ryan Lizza[58] offers a counterpoint: "What the anti-Comey arguments ignore is that if Lynch (and Obama) had maintained a more scrupulously non-partisan approach over the last two years, Comey perhaps would not have had to insert himself as publicly as he has in order to defend the FBI from allegations of political interference. Comey became the face of the investigation, to the public and to Congress, because his superiors — Obama and Lyn ch — could not. It's far better for the public to have this information now than after the election. Perhaps it's possible that this revelation will swing the election to Trump. But it seems highly unlikely. … Clinton is still favored to win, and, if she does, Comey will have done her a favor."

WAPO HIGHLIGHT:

-- "U.S. plans operation against Islamic State in Syria despite obstacles[59]," by Missy Ryan and Karen DeYoung: "The Obama administration is racing to settle questions that could scuttle a planned offensive against the Islamic State in the Syrian city of Raqqa that Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter has said will begin 'within weeks.' Senior administration officials have attributed the newl